One thing i don't understand - another : how the fuck to do a negociation without the Epsteinians directly invovled?
101... so basic
you know they control totally the ussa... okay...
still not the same
not same same...
those billionaires childrapists supported free fiat first, they refuse to fight at "idf"...
for them, they rape, they declare, they rule, but the ground, only under the flag at the mount of olive with the "top of the creamsters"
for the rest, die, work, slave, fight, kill, rape etc...
them, "white shoes gloves... "hand gloves""
the priest, makes the mind
the below, not goyims, but almost, the "lambs of abrams"
and then above, raping on island and 300m yachts, them...
under the watch of THEM (at the dod )
none the less, suckers of "idf" who their females pretend they are teh super humans of warfare, entering dijahd world...
not the same, as "dealing in plots in nyc using the said free fiat"... in eretz , no one get free sheikel, but again those who "rest" in miami...
there, you create a NECESSARY divide
some are the ground..
other rape kids from L.A. to Paris...
not the same...
one does for the other...
anyway
no innocent, not involved nor supporting
not my point
presence, of key participant, central even, in the subject of the negociation...
and so the "i don't understand"
the funny "again"
the jcpoa
already erased
dangerous in term of perception
then, their so only mighty "demoNcraPcy" of the middle east backed finance etc under the epstein flag of nikolodeon and their vast colonial estate bought through the free fiat, like amazon and 20 years of 0 profits, good luck "mom and pop" shopers with such a "banking deal"....
again, so they can be DIRECTLY in their own processes (effectively supporting childrape to mandajabb like true vaxxnazis) none the less
make it THEIRS too
THEY ARE (still) THERE...
and so put eilat on the table.
anyway
otherwise it's ridicule
a capture by a specific gang, those there
and not using the official system of the place...
in short the envoy of theirs...
necessary
otherwise
makes no sense
you won't discuss anything about ROME without ROME, you get nothing
already what the fuck?
structure , move.
at least, what i would understand as rational, logical, common practice...
a divorce, a nego, one side gone...
no no no
the idea in itself...
maybe they fear the dissocation of the american interests, the defended by macgregor, own assessment, none the less, those ON THE GROUND, there, the epsteinians, still there...
anyway...
file : not understand serie. (specially the "again" , jcpoa ,madness).