Ending Childhood Trauma Leads To Some Bizarre Changes To Society

in ecoTrain10 hours ago

ChildhoodTrauma.png

A HUGE change that is coming to Earth is how we raise children. You could say that we decide, as a group, that no child will be traumatized, and so we change all the structures of how we raise a child, what a "parent" means, and who "owns" the child.

Our idea of a nuclear family, even with a loving mother and a loving father, will be considered along the same lines as a nuclear bomb. Something to avoid.

The single mother household will be avoided as one of the most evil things you could do to a child. And the follow on from this knowing changes everything. Every relationship structure.

We will do everything in our power… we will change all the structures to do our best, to avoid destroying a child in their formative years. And every single mother household destroys the future of that child. I know that we like to call single mothers "strong", "independent", "heroes", but when we can see the damage done, we will recoil in horror and never allow single mothers.

But, this changes everything else.

- - - - - - -

The new "family" structure

In the future we will live in tribes, small communities. They may be by blood, however, blood is not that important. It is your people. The people that get you, that have your back. The people that you chose to be with.

And so, the next piece will seem strange. Why would you want to leave?

A child born to the "family", belongs to the "family". The mother can leave, but not with the child. Today, we think of a child as belonging to the mother first. A child will not be allowed to be raised by a single mother. Thus, the child will belong to the "family".

The child will be able to choose their caregivers. If one feels more comfortable with another person than the biological mother or father, they can shift to being with that person. You could say that the child can go shopping for their parents. That the biological part is less important than the child's mental health. In this way, the child can move away from any abusiveness. If one "parent" isn't that good at providing emotional support, the child can go to another.

In this way, a child can do their best to avoid abuse, that today, they are trapped inside of. Where, they can only choose their biological parents, or the state.

And yes, if the "family" finds the mother unfit to raise the child (not her child) the mother can be removed from the child's life. And in more extreme circumstances, the mother can be kicked out of the "family". This is what logically flows from the initial premise of raising a child without childhood trauma.

- - - - - - -

Childhood traumas

Our current psychological industry doesn't even recognize most of the childhood traumas. Even worse, they do not fix traumas they find, they medicated them. They get the children addicted to drugs. In what world is a therapist considered good when they get a child addicted to opioids?

The worst child abuse leaves no scars. Most people are familiar with, and repulsed by children getting physically abused. We have such an aversion to it that we let CPS take the child and do even worse abuse to them.

But, even worse are the other two types of trauma: psychological/verbal abuse and neglect. And neglect can be the mother not having enough emotional awareness to teach the child facial feedback. That game where the baby tries various faces, and the mother reflects back to the baby those things. This is the basis of understanding emotions, and children who miss this are way behind children who got it. We call these children autistic.

When a child grows up never feeling safe, like, growing up not knowing when the next meal would come. This creates a child who cannot relax. Is ever vigilant. Often is a high achiever, and so, we, society, doesn't even think they have a problem. But, they die of a heart attack, early. They cannot relax on a vacation. They cannot just let things go. And it doesn't just happen with food, there are many other things the absence of which causes huge problems.

"Families" in the future will do their best to provide all needs, regularly and structurally. Emotional AND physical!

- - - - - - -

Narcissists will not be allowed

Narcissists are incredibly destructive. Being raised by one will mean you do not have an accurate view of the world, and you don't even know what love feels like, although you think you do.

Narcissist, as i am using the term, means someone who lacks the ability of warm empathy. People who have had their conscience cut off/impaired in their childhood. They cannot look out at someone and connect with that person being hurt.

Meaning, they will gaslight, triangulate, and manipulate their own children. Meaning they will destroy their child's psyche without any regret, and only because the narcissist needs to feel in control.

And, narcissists often raise narcissists.

The future humans will recognize these creatures, and not let them near children. (nor allow them into any elected office)

(There are alien planets out there that will terminate or erase/reset the brain of a narcissist. They will not allow them to exist on the planet.)

"Families" in the future will not allow narcissists (psychopaths, sociopaths) near children. And probably won't allow them in their group in the first place.

- - - - - - -

From inside a "family", it might seem obvious that the child belongs to the "family". It is the group that provides the food. It is the group that raises the child.

When you have multiple mothers in the same nursery, it seems obvious that they are a group raising all the children.

And when you are in that kind of environment you do not remove the child from the group. But, when you apply that logic to our modern day, you find that everything changed; everything must change. And that goes all the way down to "mother does not own her own child".

If you talked to your average woman today, and you told them about shared parenting, where you had many women in the nursery all helping out, most women would say they love the idea of that, and why do we not have that now?

Then you talk to the same woman about giving up rights to their own child, and they will call you a monster, an evil person. "How dare you bring up such a thing!?". However, that will be a cornerstone of the new "family". And it will probably be accepted by most of the women on the planet as just the way it is, the way it should be.

- - - - - - -

All images in this post are my own original creations.